<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Firefox is still better.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://myipc.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/why-firefox-is-still-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://myipc.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/why-firefox-is-still-better/</link>
	<description>There&#039;s an answer to everything. All you have to go do is find it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 12:24:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zachdude1094</title>
		<link>http://myipc.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/why-firefox-is-still-better/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>zachdude1094</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 15:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myipc.wordpress.com/?p=635#comment-251</guid>
		<description>My experiences with Chrome have usually been that Chrome is a very fast browser, and it is, but like you said, &quot;Chrome is very fast when you access it but is very slow when it’s already operating.&quot; And that&#039;s especially true when you try to run anything that uses shockwave in Chrome, Chrome almost always freezes on me.

I agree, Chrome is the opposite of Firefox. Firefox unfortunately has a slower startup, but still, for me, Firefox starts up in 7 seconds or less (I counted), so it&#039;s now that big a deal for me.

Chrome is a good backup browser, a lot better than IE anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My experiences with Chrome have usually been that Chrome is a very fast browser, and it is, but like you said, &#8220;Chrome is very fast when you access it but is very slow when it’s already operating.&#8221; And that&#8217;s especially true when you try to run anything that uses shockwave in Chrome, Chrome almost always freezes on me.</p>
<p>I agree, Chrome is the opposite of Firefox. Firefox unfortunately has a slower startup, but still, for me, Firefox starts up in 7 seconds or less (I counted), so it&#8217;s now that big a deal for me.</p>
<p>Chrome is a good backup browser, a lot better than IE anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pochp</title>
		<link>http://myipc.wordpress.com/2009/06/05/why-firefox-is-still-better/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>pochp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 14:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://myipc.wordpress.com/?p=635#comment-250</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not even sure Chrome is faster.
Chrome is very fast when you access it but is very slow when it&#039;s already operating. It&#039;s the reverse for Firefox.
Anyway, Chrome is still a very useful backup browser and I&#039;m grateful for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not even sure Chrome is faster.<br />
Chrome is very fast when you access it but is very slow when it&#8217;s already operating. It&#8217;s the reverse for Firefox.<br />
Anyway, Chrome is still a very useful backup browser and I&#8217;m grateful for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
